Hi,
I made a model in Rhino, and by using grasshopper I made an INX file for Envi-met.
But the model doesn't look perfect like the picture below.
At first I thought there was some problems with that model.
However, when the entire model was spaced about 1cm above from the surface in rhino, it looked like the picture below.
So I think there is no problem with the shape of the model.
I am curious whether the model in the first picture is only visible problem or is not modeled properly.
If there is a problem, how can I solve it?
Thanks for the help,
Su
Rhino to envi-met model problems
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:32 pm
Re: Rhino to envi-met model problems
Hi Su,
I think it is a question of tolerance, Rhino has this concept. Maybe the surfaces are not perfectly on the grid and what is below the grid is not recognized by DF-Legacy envimet components.
The strategy to move it up a bit the soil geometry is fine because it will be reprojected on the right plane when the INX is done. Soil surfaces to model can be moved also in this way, for example: So the second model is correct.
Best,
Antonello
I think it is a question of tolerance, Rhino has this concept. Maybe the surfaces are not perfectly on the grid and what is below the grid is not recognized by DF-Legacy envimet components.
The strategy to move it up a bit the soil geometry is fine because it will be reprojected on the right plane when the INX is done. Soil surfaces to model can be moved also in this way, for example: So the second model is correct.
Best,
Antonello
Re: Rhino to envi-met model problems
Thank you for your answer!
Re: Rhino to envi-met model problems
Hi Antonello,AntonelloDN wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:21 pm Hi Su,
I think it is a question of tolerance, Rhino has this concept. Maybe the surfaces are not perfectly on the grid and what is below the grid is not recognized by DF-Legacy envimet components.
The strategy to move it up a bit the soil geometry is fine because it will be reprojected on the right plane when the INX is done. Soil surfaces to model can be moved also in this way, for example:
test_soil.PNG
So the second model is correct.
Best,
Antonello
I have somehow the same problem. I do not know why roads and the river layer is not correctly simulated in envimet? Here is my model.
Bests,
Marjan
Re: Rhino to envi-met model problems
I found the problem, just in case if it's someone else problem as well,marjanmrd wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 1:23 pmHi Antonello,AntonelloDN wrote: ↑Mon Nov 30, 2020 1:21 pm Hi Su,
I think it is a question of tolerance, Rhino has this concept. Maybe the surfaces are not perfectly on the grid and what is below the grid is not recognized by DF-Legacy envimet components.
The strategy to move it up a bit the soil geometry is fine because it will be reprojected on the right plane when the INX is done. Soil surfaces to model can be moved also in this way, for example:
test_soil.PNG
So the second model is correct.
Best,
Antonello
I have somehow the same problem. I do not know why roads and the river layer is not correctly simulated in envimet? Here is my model.
11.png
Bests,
Marjan
The layers which were not ok in my simulation were under the red axis. So all layers should be above the base surface and also the red axis.